Disclaimer: this is NOT supporting the TALMUD but Revealing what's INSIDE THE TALMUDTidbits From The TalmudErubin 21b. Whosoever disobeys the rabbis deserves death and will be punished by being boiled in hot excrement in hell.Moed Kattan 17a . If a Jew is tempted to do evil he should go to a city where he is not known and do the evil there.Non-Jews are Not Human Baba Mezia 114a-114b. Only Jews are human ("Only ye are designated men").Also see Kerithoth 6b under the sub-head, "Oil of Anointing" and Berakoth 58a in which Gentile women are designated animals ("she-asses").Jews are Divine, Sanhedrin 58b. If a heathen (Gentile) hits a Jew, the Gentile must be killed. Hitting a Jew is the same as hitting God.O.K. to Cheat Non-Jews, Sanhedrin 57a . A Jew need not pay a Gentile ("Cuthean") the wages owed him for work.Jews Have Superior Legal Status, Baba Kamma 37b. "If an ox of an Israelite gores an ox of a Canaanite there is no liability; but if an ox of a Canaanite gores an ox of an Israelite...the payment is to be in full."Jews May Steal from Non-Jews, Baba Mezia 24a . If a Jew finds an object lost by a Gentile ("heathen") it does not have to be returned. (Affirmed also in Baba Kamma 113b).Sanhedrin 76a . God will not spare a Jew who "marries his daughter to an old man or takes a wife for his infant son or returns a lost article to a Cuthean..."Jews May Rob and Kill Non-Jews, Sanhedrin 57a . When a Jew murders a Gentile ("Cuthean"), there will be no death penalty.Jews May Lie to Non-Jews, Baba Kamma 113a. Jews may use lies ("subterfuges") to circumvent a Gentile.Non-Jewish Children Sub-Human, Yebamoth 98a. All Gentile children are animals.Abodah Zarah 36b . Gentile girls are in a state of niddah (filth) from birth.Abodah Zarah 22a-22b . Gentiles prefer sex with cows.Abodah Zarah 67b . "The vessels of Gentiles, do they not impart a worsened flavor to the food cooked in them?"Insults Against Mary, Sanhedrin 106a . Says Jesus' mother was a whore: "She who was the descendant of princes and governors played the harlot with carpenters." Also in footnote #2 to Shabbath 104b it is stated that in the "uncensored" text of the Talmud it is written that Jesus mother, "Miriam the hairdresser," had sex with many men.Gloats over Christ Dying Young, A passage from Sanhedrin 106 gloats over the early age at which Jesus died: "Hast thou heard how old Balaam (Jesus) was?--He replied: It is not actually stated but since it is written, Bloody and deceitful men shall not live out half their days it follows that he was thirty-three or thirty-four years old."Says Jesus was a Sorcerer, Sanhedrin 43a . Says Jesus ("Yeshu" and in footnote #6, Yeshu "the Nazarene") was executed because he practiced sorcery.Horrible Blasphemy of Jesus, Gittin 57a . Says Jesus ( see footnote #4) is being boiled in "hot excrement."Sanhedrin 43a . Jesus deserved execution: "On the eve of the Passover, Yeshu was hanged...Do you suppose that he was one for whom a defense could be made? Was he not a Mesith (enticer)?"Category: News & Politics
The Talmud is the Talmud and the Bible is the Bible. They are two different texts. My first clue to your cluelessness was your equating the two as "The Talmud Bible".
Illiterates do that, they mix two dissimilar ideas and try to make it one. You're not illiterate, are you?
Dude. You are seriously committing the same dumb error with Judaism that Christians commit when they misrepresent 'the bible' and think they have justified their goofy interpretations. Most Christians see no difference between the old and new testaments, despite the little issue of Christ himself having clearly repudiated the ideologies of the old testament (blood sacrifice, the status of being 'chosen people,' the inhumanity of gentiles, the old covenant, etc.).
In other words, you is an old fashioned anti semite, Man, and not because you attack Israel. Anti Semites can have an accurate critique of Israel, and your critique is accurate. Where your shite goes off the rails is in your queer characterization of "Israeli/Jews" What does that mean? "Israelis"? Jews? Are you only speaking of Israeli Jews? If so, you makes lots of claims that people living in Israel would have no power to effect, since they are not citizens of the US, and the Israeli lobby is not possibly as omnipotent as would be neessary to justify your claims otherwise. Not to mention, not all Israeli Jews INSIDE of Israel support Israeli fascism.
You do know don't you that most Jews on the planet are not citizens of Israel? Many or even most American Jews do not support Israeli fascism, you know that, right? And who are these "Jews" anyway? People of Jewish descent? That would include me, and lots of other African Americans. One of my best friends, Jim Nadell, a Miami area broadcaster, is 100% Jewish, but he is a bitter critic of Israel. Which leads to your other squirrely comment, that these "Isreali/Jews" happen to "make up 2% of our nations society." HUH? Whaaa? Where did you pull this statistic out of other than you booty? You say "Since they took over Federal Reserves where we make our money, they seem to make trillions without oversight. And own Hollywood, News media, Large Corporations, Congress, AIPAC, Military, and many name brand product, ( Coca Cola, DP, Pepsi, Starbucks, McDonalds etc. etc." Whew. You cross out of the valley of goofy into the shadow of crazy with that. What the frack are you talking about there, huh? Not even the Cylons have that kind of social penetration, but at LEAST we can politically, racially, and genetically determine who and what a Cylon IS, whereas Antisemitism clouds the valid political issues some of us have risked our careers and lives fighting for by changing the frickin subject from valid politics and economics to what you are talking about: the Boogey Jew. The Boogey Jew is gonna get you, he's under your bed, he's gonna get your mama and turn her into a gefilte fish and can her and ship her to Israel. No, Dude. No.
I'm making a point here: written analytic dicourse (as opposed to invective or propaganda) is difficult--its hard. You don't just grab a pugio and launch yourself out onto the sand and think you're going to fight the gladiators and win. You train, You get your chops together. You READ stuff, and synthesize it, and at all times you balance a lot of very SPRECIFIC, contradictory, and finely detailed realities and facts and texts. You don't talk about a single text, like Talmud, as if it were an UrText. Unless you are Jewish yourself and you were gullible enough to believe your grandfather that Talmud is supreme and above analysis. NO text is an UrText, which is why racists who claim that Arabs are terrorists due to the war-like passages they pull from the Koran as if it were an Urtext, are ziplock thinkers.
You not only cannot prove any of these fatuous statistics you assert, you cannot even define these terms you are applying the statistics to. Dude. READ stuff other than "Protocols of The Elders of Zion" and stop saying stuff like, "The Jews owned 75% of the slave trade and blamed it on whites and 25% were mostly blacks." Dude. 25% of WHO were 'mostly Blacks" 25% of slaves? Of slave traders? Of "The" Jews who owned 75%? HUH?
Finally, Dude, have you heard of hermeneutics? It's a term arising out of the name, "Hermes" who was the messenger of the Gods. It's the science of close reading of texts which involves cross reading and reading in the margins and through the silences of texts. I have a degree in it from Cornell University where I studied with people like feminist Molly Hite, semiotician, Jonathan Culler, and Marxist, Walter Cohen (NOT an Israeli). You are seriously butchering the text of Talmud. You are extracting historically bound terms and concepts and misrepresenting them in the 21st century context of your blog with no sensible caveats about what is happening as you perform this act of historical TRANSLATION. Dude, something tells me you don't know how to. That makes you dangerous, Dude. If not just stupid. Let's not even talk about how you butcher meaning as you are going from Hebrew to English without gloss or caveat.
What about the Kabala? What about the generative texts and rabbinical commentaries that go along with the Talmudic soundbytes you snatch and scratch in your samples?
Check out Jacques Derrida's "Glas" which teaches how to read at the margins of a text as well as account for the silences of a text. I mean, if texts matter to you and are not just props you use to hold up you odious racial attack on Jewish people.
Dude. You are either a self hating Jew or an antisemitic bad reader. Either way, to scholars, the worst thing is the 'bad reader' part.
https://theblacklist.net/
Comments
Illiterates do that, they mix two dissimilar ideas and try to make it one. You're not illiterate, are you?
In other words, you is an old fashioned anti semite, Man, and not because you attack Israel. Anti Semites can have an accurate critique of Israel, and your critique is accurate. Where your shite goes off the rails is in your queer characterization of "Israeli/Jews" What does that mean? "Israelis"? Jews? Are you only speaking of Israeli Jews? If so, you makes lots of claims that people living in Israel would have no power to effect, since they are not citizens of the US, and the Israeli lobby is not possibly as omnipotent as would be neessary to justify your claims otherwise. Not to mention, not all Israeli Jews INSIDE of Israel support Israeli fascism.
You do know don't you that most Jews on the planet are not citizens of Israel? Many or even most American Jews do not support Israeli fascism, you know that, right? And who are these "Jews" anyway? People of Jewish descent? That would include me, and lots of other African Americans. One of my best friends, Jim Nadell, a Miami area broadcaster, is 100% Jewish, but he is a bitter critic of Israel. Which leads to your other squirrely comment, that these "Isreali/Jews" happen to "make up 2% of our nations society." HUH? Whaaa? Where did you pull this statistic out of other than you booty? You say "Since they took over Federal Reserves where we make our money, they seem to make trillions without oversight. And own Hollywood, News media, Large Corporations, Congress, AIPAC, Military, and many name brand product, ( Coca Cola, DP, Pepsi, Starbucks, McDonalds etc. etc." Whew. You cross out of the valley of goofy into the shadow of crazy with that. What the frack are you talking about there, huh? Not even the Cylons have that kind of social penetration, but at LEAST we can politically, racially, and genetically determine who and what a Cylon IS, whereas Antisemitism clouds the valid political issues some of us have risked our careers and lives fighting for by changing the frickin subject from valid politics and economics to what you are talking about: the Boogey Jew. The Boogey Jew is gonna get you, he's under your bed, he's gonna get your mama and turn her into a gefilte fish and can her and ship her to Israel. No, Dude. No.
I'm making a point here: written analytic dicourse (as opposed to invective or propaganda) is difficult--its hard. You don't just grab a pugio and launch yourself out onto the sand and think you're going to fight the gladiators and win. You train, You get your chops together. You READ stuff, and synthesize it, and at all times you balance a lot of very SPRECIFIC, contradictory, and finely detailed realities and facts and texts. You don't talk about a single text, like Talmud, as if it were an UrText. Unless you are Jewish yourself and you were gullible enough to believe your grandfather that Talmud is supreme and above analysis. NO text is an UrText, which is why racists who claim that Arabs are terrorists due to the war-like passages they pull from the Koran as if it were an Urtext, are ziplock thinkers.
You not only cannot prove any of these fatuous statistics you assert, you cannot even define these terms you are applying the statistics to. Dude. READ stuff other than "Protocols of The Elders of Zion" and stop saying stuff like, "The Jews owned 75% of the slave trade and blamed it on whites and 25% were mostly blacks." Dude. 25% of WHO were 'mostly Blacks" 25% of slaves? Of slave traders? Of "The" Jews who owned 75%? HUH?
Finally, Dude, have you heard of hermeneutics? It's a term arising out of the name, "Hermes" who was the messenger of the Gods. It's the science of close reading of texts which involves cross reading and reading in the margins and through the silences of texts. I have a degree in it from Cornell University where I studied with people like feminist Molly Hite, semiotician, Jonathan Culler, and Marxist, Walter Cohen (NOT an Israeli). You are seriously butchering the text of Talmud. You are extracting historically bound terms and concepts and misrepresenting them in the 21st century context of your blog with no sensible caveats about what is happening as you perform this act of historical TRANSLATION. Dude, something tells me you don't know how to. That makes you dangerous, Dude. If not just stupid. Let's not even talk about how you butcher meaning as you are going from Hebrew to English without gloss or caveat.
What about the Kabala? What about the generative texts and rabbinical commentaries that go along with the Talmudic soundbytes you snatch and scratch in your samples?
Check out Jacques Derrida's "Glas" which teaches how to read at the margins of a text as well as account for the silences of a text. I mean, if texts matter to you and are not just props you use to hold up you odious racial attack on Jewish people.
Dude. You are either a self hating Jew or an antisemitic bad reader. Either way, to scholars, the worst thing is the 'bad reader' part.
Shalom.