TheBlackList Pub

For All Points-Of-The-View.

The experience of Africans under Arab colonialism and its antithesis

A synopsis of the paper- ‘The experience of Africans under Arab colonialism and its antithesis’, delivered at the International Colloquium at the State University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 11-13 November 2008, on the theme, ‘Teaching and propagating African history and culture to the Diaspora and …’

The key to understanding Afro-Arab relations, past and present and the relevance of South Sudan to the future, is found in the reasons for the conflict in South Sudan of 1955-72 and 1983- 2005. The Commander-in-Chief of the Anya-nya liberation Army of South Sudan, Major General Joseph Lagu, and the Late Colonel/Dr John Garang de Mabior of the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement/Army (SPLM/A) stated that the root causes of the wars were cultural/racial, being the distinction between the Arab and the African. The Arabised mixed-race Africans of the centre, around Khartoum, sort to Arabise and Islamise the Africans of the periphery, including Southern Sudan. Here one should mention that Khartoum enjoys the support of the leading US Islamist, Louis Farrakan, who has received material support from the Sudan President Bashir. Farrakan and others from the African Western Diaspora deny that slavery exists in Sudan and forced Islamisation.

Denationalistion, by way of Arabisation, is also in evidence in Darfur in Sudan today, where the black Moslem ethnic groups, the Fur, Masaleit and Zaghawa are being demographically ‘cleansed ‘ by an Islamic militia and replaced by black Africans who are Moslems with a greater degree of Arabisation, such as the Taoureg of West Africa.

The issues that the Afro-Arab Borderlands raise, in places such as Sudan, date back a millennium, having deeper roots than the settler colonialism of Southern Africa and North America, providing a more historically rooted definition of the African nationality than that of the black consciousness movement. What we learn is that the African nationality is primarily cultural, not race based. This has profound implications for the African unity movement and is in keeping with Diop’s thesis on the African cultural origins of world civilisation.

Africa has an Eastern Diaspora, including Arabia and points east of Africa, in the Gulf states, the Middle-East, North Africa and Asia. More slaves were trafficked eastwards from Africa, than westward to the Caribbean and the Americas. The African Nation is constituted by Africa south of the Sahara, plus the Eastern and Western Diasporas, in the Americas, Europe etc. The unity of Africans can only be realized if premised on the unity of the African Nation.

African slaves were taken across the Red Sea, and the Persian Gulf, to India and points eastwards. There had been the first out-migration of Black Africans out of Africa to populate the world. The Black people, such as those found today in Papua New Guinea, Australia and the Philippines are evidence of this. The Eastern Diaspora is ‘disjointed’. Research indicates its desire to reconnect, if not repatriate, back to Africa.

There can be no peace in the Borderlands, without a structural change in Afro-Arab relations. Such an adjustment must incorporate not only the admission of guilt but also atonement, raising the issue of reparations. There cannot be closure without an opening by the wrong-doer, to enable review and judgement. These are prima facie requirements to begin the Afro-Arab civilization dialogue.

Arab-led slavery of Africans and genocide, as found in South Sudan and Darfur, go to the core of Afro-Arab relations. These issues were hushed-up in the past. Now is the time to confront them. At the heart of the matter is Arab racism and hegemony. The Arabs arrived in Africa in the 8th century AD. Prior to their appearance the Egyptian civilization in the Nile Delta held sway, which was a Black culture, as were Kush and Ethiopia, before Egypt. The Arab penetration proceeded by the Islamisation and Arabisation of the Africans, who were denationalised and enslaved. This presence is therefore correctly called Arab settler colonialism. It’s antithesis proceeds by the establishment of the African Nation.

The Black Egyptian civilization, Arab enslavement of Africans and Arab colonialism are to be included in the curriculum reform agenda for schools, particularly in Arabia.

B.F.Bankie, September 2008, Juba, South Sudan
bfbankie@yahoo.com

Views: 2259

Comment

You need to be a member of TheBlackList Pub to add comments!

Join TheBlackList Pub


South
Comment by Abdurrahman T. L. Nelson on May 16, 2009 at 5:20pm
No Arab country has colonized Sudan. The Egyptian-Sudan Union was not one of colonization. There has been continous settlement of Sudan by an indigenous people throughout recorded history. What has happened is cultural change in as much as the Nubians have intermarried with Arabs to a large extent. Thus, many Sudanese of the North are Arabic speakers.

They are also Muslims. Islam came to North Africa to liberate Egypt from Roman colonization. In any case, Arabs should not be considered as non-Africans as they are a product of intemarriage between Africans and Asians. (Even so, I find it hard to prove that Asians have migrated towards Arabia and Africa to any signifcant extent. I think these peoples are always been in this region since pre-historic times. If anyone has evidence to the contrary, please share it.) This process has occurred in Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. Thus, there is a cultural basis for unity not only of all the nations in Africa; but unity between Africa and Arabia, as well. This is especially evident when we consider the close cultural links between Somalia and Yemen.

If these two countries Somalia and Yemen, alone would unite, they could control world trade through the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. This is Black Power. And, we must learn to not be afraid to take this kind of Black Power. Balkanism has no place in the modern world. Africa Unity/Pan-Africanism is the undoing of the effects of the slave trade. We will never be free and resepcted until we overcome narrow parocialism, tribalism, sectarianism, etc. The small clans and tribes must give way as we progress towards an ever deepening and growing and developing and maturing African Nation that includes everybody.

DMV
Comment by Olatunji Mwamba on November 25, 2008 at 7:54am
I think we accepted it becuase of our nauter, which is at its core, peaceful. We now have to move to new level of peace; one of futherance of our progeny. This means adopting the essential nature of survival, as Dr. Clarke put it. We must adopt the concept of Hannibal, which is, there are some people who want to destroy us so we must take the fight to them first. Until we overstand the need to do this we will continue to flounder. Ma'at Hetepu, Olatunji Mwamba

Chicago-Midwest
Comment by Enoch Mubarak on November 24, 2008 at 1:10pm
The white slaves(mamalukes) rebelled against the slave captors with such violence and brutality that the slave captors determined that whites don't make good slaves so why then do you suppose blacks accepted slavery without resistance?

Donations Accepted


© 2019   Created by KWASI Akyeampong.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Rivers APC Hails Rt. Hon. Chibuike Amaechi at 53
= = https://theblacklist.net/