Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi adresses the African Union summit.
American Jews Leave African Union Summit After Protests
Egyptian Envoys Objected to 'Israeli' Delegation
An American Jewish delegation at an African Union summit left after AU delegates objected to its presence.
The nine person delegation, which included Malcolm Hoenlein, the executive vice president of the Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish American Organizations, had been invited by summit organizers to attend this week’s events in Equatorial Guinea.
Hoenlein said Friday he considers the visit a success. He and the members of the delegation, who attended in individual capacities and did not collectively represent any organization, had between 12 and 15 meetings with African leaders on Wednesday, the day before the official summit launch. CONTINUES
https://theblacklist.net/
Replies
After reading the book: The Secret Relationship Between Blacks and Jews, it is obvious that "Jews" want to attend Black Union Summitts for one reason. They donate funds to Black organizations so they they will not speak out against "Jews" no matter their aggression against Blacks, Palestinians, and others whom they detest. Obviously, the Egyptian envoys know something we don't - something that they do not wish to disclose.
revolutionary greetings,
first of all, let me state that this is not the same nat turner who has posted before. now, with that out of the way, it is tantamount to betrayal of the ideological pursuit of the so-called afrikan union. now, either there are two afrikan unions or there is one, one which began in the early twentieth century with such elders as george padmore, and marcus garvey, and furthered by the likes of kwame nkhrumah who recognized the importance of an afrikan confederation of states.
if that is the spirit in which the present one operates, then the summit's organizers, who invited the white jewish contingent, need to be relinquished of their responsibility: maintaining the purity of the afrikan union. for anyone who has studied the history of colonialism and its various mechanisms, by which to keep hold of the mother continent because of its vast natural resources, it will occur to him or her that the presence of white-euro-amerikkkans, of the so-called judaistic faith, is an obvious attempt at infiltration or even one to sow the seeds of discord, which appears to have been the case: divide and conquer as a strategy to continue the white supremacist objective of world domination over the indigenous black and brown peoples of earth.
there is no rationale for inviting them, beyond the fact that the summit's organizers' displaying their complicity in the hidden ambitions of those allowed to sit in and so-call observe a needed private affair, whereby afrikan nations have an arena to discuss the future survival of the mother continent's indigenous inhabitants, who have been under siege by foreigner powers which have no regard for afrikan existence.
again, this is an clear analysis based on whether the current afrikan union operates in the spirit of those who came before the present leaders. beyond that, if it is not, then it would make all the sense in the world that there were white-euro-amerikkkans, of the so-called jewish persuasion, in attendance at the so-called afrikan union summit. it is no more, no less than a shame, a farce, made to appear genuine to the brothers and sistars who have put their faith in its leadership. it is the european union in black face, meant to prevent the extrication, even the slightest attempt, of mother afrika from out of the vile clutches of the anglo-amerikkkan establishment head-quartered in london. in that case, the guilty must be removed and replaced by any means necessary with brothers and sisters, who won't bow down to the foreign powers of white globalism and its various disguises such as the war on terrorism.
UHURU SASA!
I believe as brother Malcolm believed there is no place at our table of discussion about the future of Africa or its people with Israel or the united states' so if they wish to support us they can do so by returning the wealth they have extracted from our land . We need to make all decisions relative to reclaiming the motherland and the politics of future development. We don't get to help make decisions about their lands and if they want to show their respect stay out of the way and allow African people to control their own destiny as brother Malcolm once stated do nothing..
Great brother the words you spoke were flowing out of my own heart. I really appreciate your knowledge of the African situation and please continue to enlighten these brothers and sisters who has given on up the motherland at the most important place in their spirit. I agree with you 1000% and more we must spend every waking hour fighting to reclaim our rightful place in the world 'reparation lets begin by taking back our homeland. hotep
revolutionary greetings,
yes, taking back the motherland is the what WE have to do. it must be OUR first goal. and OUR ideology must be revolutionary. anything short of that is prolonging neo-colonialism, only a loosening of the noose and not its severing. there is no such thing as a little freedom. therefore, the afrikan union's leaders or representatives have to continue the work in the spirit of nkrumah, fanon, cabral, lumumba, and mugabe. they have to keep their spirit alive. the heads of the afrikan union must be carefully watched and held in the strictest discipline of revolutionary means. there can't be any middle of the road politics. WE are either free or continued slaves. and if they are unable, afraid or unwilling to do so, they have to be relieved of their responsibility to the people. all too many times, afrikan leadership has been shaped by western education which means the possible stunting of any kind of freedom from the enemy's clutches. WE have wasted too much time on intellectual masturbation and tap-dancing around reality, and have spent too little preparing OURselves for what must occur by the laws of nature, considering the enemy's brutal historical treatment of the motherland and its indigenous peoples.
UHURU!
I DID NOT GO TO SCHOOL FOR ALL THE DEGREES YOU HAVE ACCUMULATED LIKE DR. RUFUS OLUMBA. BUT I WENT TO THE SCHOOL OF HARD KNOCKS.
IF YOU LISTEN TO ME AND JOIN ME AND DO WHAT I DO, YOUR DESCENDANTS WILL KNOW THAT WE, YOU AND I LIVED IN AMERICA AND DID WHAT AMERICANS DO BEST. AND WHAT IS THAT? AMEICANS ARE UNITED UNDER ONE GOVERNMENT, CREATED BY THEMSELVES AND FOR THEM. AFRICANS MUST EMULATE THE YANKEES.
THEY THINK OF THEMSELVES AND HAVE INTEREST IN THE REST OF THE WORLD. YOU MUST LEARN THAT SIMPLE LIFE STYLE. THINK OF AFRICA FIRST. THEN HAVE INTEREST IN THE WORLD. IF YOU ARE A USA CITIZEN, AS I AM, THEN THINK OF AFRICA AND AMERICA FOR THE TWO ARE YOUR COUNTRIES.
BUT BECAUSE AFRICA IS ABOUT 500 YEARS BEHIND AMERICA IN POLITICAL UNITY, WE AS AFRICANS MUST EMULATE THE BEST OF AMERICANS AND THAT IS ENSHRINED IN THE PREAMBLE OF THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTION CREATING A GOVERNMENT FOR THE AMERICANS.
WE MUST URGE OUR AFRICAN LEADERS; THE HEADS OF STATES TO EMULATE THE AMERICANS BY MAKING US ONE PEOPLE:
"THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION
Showing, written larger than the rest, We the People
(Preamble)
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America"
ONCE WE ARE MADE ONE PEOPLE UNDER ONE GOVERNMENT, THEN ETHIOPIANS AND GHANAINANS, ERITREANS, GAMBIANS, EGYPTIANS, SOUTH AFRICANS; IN FACT, AFRICANS FROM EAST AFRICA TO WEST AFRICA, SOUTH TO NORTH AFRICA WILL THINK OF THEMSELVES AS BROTHERS AND SISTERS LIVING ON ONE LAND WHERE GOD HAS DISTRUBUTED THE RICHES OF AFRICA TO ALL THE 54 STATES.
AND IT IS OUR DUTY AS HUMAN BEINGS WITH GOD GIVEN COMMON SENSE, TO COMBINE ALL THE RICHES OF AFRICA UNDER ONE GOVERNMENT AND ONE CURRENCY SO THAT WE ALL CAN SHARE THE RICHES OF AFRICA; BOTH MATERIAL AND HUMAN BECAUSE WE ARE BY AFRICAN CONSTITUTION ONE PEOPLE. YES, WE CAN, WE CAN DO IT.
Join us at www.sadainc.org and www.sada54.org
Dr. Kofi Agyapong
SADA
revolutionary greetings,
let's get some fact straight in order to get to the points that you have made. for there is no cart without the horse. nkrumah, as with any of the other leaders of his day, was obviously being held hostage. he tried to play the game and got burned. burned by who? the same forces that pretended to give a damn about our people. sometimes i wonder whether or not we are just plain cursed, to believe in such things as good whites or europeans who are going to somehow come and lend us a hand without looking forward to residuals of some kind.
unless he or she is willing to sacrifice his or her white privilege, resort to john brown tactics, reaching the point of no return, we are pissing in the wind, have become so dis-illusioned due to white-euro-amerikkkan terrorism's many machinations. how is it that those of us who can garner degrees in this and that field of study and yet are so blind to reality; a disease of the utmost kind?
in observance of afrika's dilemma, cabral once correctly stated that the history of afrika didn't start with the european conquest of the mother continent. it stopped. therefore, it is only fitting that you would state how afrika is five hundred years behind. for before the white man came, afrika was five hundred years ahead of a europe that was reeling backward, the so-called dark ages. and who brought them out of that?
so the political unity that you speak of is predicated on creating the new afrikan, as fanon correctly pointed out. and where do we start building the new afrikan? it definitely ain't with modeling him on the united snakkkes constitution, a document actually meant for the white ruling class. it behooves me how you turn to such a farcical document, when it's proprietors were slavemasters, solely in the business of perpetuating their rule over afrikans held as chattel. there are many examples from which we can draw right out of the mother continent for inspiration. have you forgotten? that's what eurocentric dysfunctionalism does.
UHURU SASA!
I have no problem with you brother, You have been misinformed. That manipulative old 501 (c) 3 hustler bothers me. He acts as if this is our first conversation. I informed him the last time that we talked that I knew the history of the slave trade very well and it was HIS PEOPLE who captured us and sent us to the Americas, not the ARABS. HIS PEOPLE sold slaves both to the Arabs and Europeans. See how cavalier he is about the Africans incarcerated in Israel and how carefully he maneuvered around the disgust of the South Africans who can remember how ISRAEL and the U.S supported the Apartheid regime with weaponry and intelligence. The next thing he is going to sell you is a Chief stool.
You are on the wrong side because you hate the fact that his people [AKANS] sold Africans to the Arabs for salt ??Think about that one brother; for salt and they sold us for colored glass and gin. I lived in Ghana, and I have went to the slave forts. There are 56 in Ghana. Ask Kofi his tribe and then look it up. They were slave traders. It has been the MUSLIMS that have fought every slave trader in the Americas and Africa. Our history shows that we were at every rebellion from Haiti, to Detroit, and we are very proud of the fact that we are the Maroons, the fighters, up until the days of Malcolm, Khalid, the Black Panthers and the NOI. So we know who he is, and we know who we are...We are from the inland of Africa and it is these coastal Africans, and their gin, and spirits, and their European and now Zionist partners that we will always be ready for. They will never learn and will end up slaves in their own country like the Kenyans and Delta Nigerians. These are the Negroes and Sell-outs of Africa. I know his kind very well. They will not prosper.
revolutionary greetings,
it appears to me that you waver from one side to the next between being a muslim and afrikan. therefore, you entered religious affiliation into the fray. now, the question is: how did afrikans become muslims, malcolm, khalid? or am i missing something? there are those of us who would be very confused about the labels arab, and muslim as they apply to the history of afrika.
That which you speak about afrikans selling afrikans to the arabs is obviously predicated on unseen forces. were there tribal wars that the europeans exploited, just like they exploit the present street tribalism of amerikkka? so, it would appear to be rather misleading without mentioning the conditions which were present at the time of the slave trade.
in addition, any white euro-amerikkkan, desperately trying to defend his or her country's legitimacy, will enjoy your pointing out the afrikan involvement in the slave trade because it gives them some psychological relief.
and since, you brought up the subject about who sold who to who, was it not the arabs, claiming they were muslims - ones who submit their will to god - that participated in the pre-european slave trade? or were they just arabs and not muslims. was it not also some afrikans such as tippu tip, turned muslim, who were also in the business, against which the europeans were claiming to enter and eradicate during the so-called scramble? and is it not the muslim-arabs are who selling our people pork and alcohol today in the so-called ghettos?
in essence, what am i saying? we can take our own prejudiced angles and spew whatever it is we want to those of us who are unsuspecting of individualist agendas. the fact is, afrikans don't really have any friends just as john henry clark pointed out. the euro-amerikkkans come in and say that they want to help us develop. so how long will we continue to be a developing nation? meanwhile, the muslim come in and say that the euro-amerikkkans are the infidels, yet they continue to display contempt for our traditional ways of life, especially afrikan spiritualism, which, as funny as it is, is the foundation of all the major so-called religions, which have been volleying for world supremacy. when will the black man give his enemies back their religions and turn inward to himself?
and by the way, the 501c3 is certainly a hustle!
UHURU SASA!
Egypt has no right or business dragging Africa into the family feud between Arab and Israeli or as some would say between brothers Ishmael and Isaac, that is their argument and not ours.
Egypt should be meek and grateful that it has been readmitted into the A.U., one, the true legitimacy of the Al Sisi government is rather dubious, secondly, Egypt is threatening war with Ethiopia for daring to continue in building a hydro electrical dam which it disapproves of, making spurious claims of Egypt's existence being under threat.
Egypt clings to a British colonial agreement which gave it the Lion's share of Nile river water without consideration to other Nile Valley countries of Black Africa.
Note the troubles afflicting Africa at this moment, just as countries are emerging from the quagmire of colonialism, mainly stem from Islamist insurgencies, quite often threatening to split nations in two while setting up "their half" as Islamic republics.
Note also that Islam and the Arabs decimated our continent for almost a millennium before Europe came and finished off the job.
All of the Islamists groupings owe allegiance to Al Qaeda, which America built to fight the former Soviet Union, these groups now attack the main threat to America, the B.R.I.C.S. nations and those nations, particularly in Africa who are growing with them. America and the West need to control oil and other vital resources much of which can be found in Africa.
We cannot allow the Arabs who stole and occupy the apple of the African world to drag us into a fight which is not ours, while at the same time threatening war for using the Nile river which emerges deep within the continent.
As for Azania - South Africa siding with Egypt on this matter, this comes from a strictly political stance as the state of Israel is seen to be behaving towards the Palestinians as apartheid did down here.
-
1
-
2
of 2 Next