Imagine If Armed Black Lives Matter Protesters Occupied a Federal Building

NB Commentary: Yeah, tell me about it.

Here’s a question worth asking right now: What would happen if 150 armed Black Lives Matter protesters occupied a federal building?
This is exactly what an armed white militia did when they took over the headquarters at the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters in Burns, Oregon.  Known in some circles as #YallQaeda, who are waging #YeHawd, they reportedly took the action to protest the government control of land in the West, and punishment of two local ranchers who refused to sell their land.  Specifically, Dwight and Steven Hammond, father and son, were convicted of arson on federal land.  A member of the group, Ammon Bundy, son of Nevada anti-government rancher Cliven Bundy, said the group is “planning on staying here for years” and told the Oregonian they are “willing to kill and be killed if necessary.” Another militia member said, “I didn’t come here to shoot, I came here to die.”
Meanwhile, also joining Bundy is Ryan Payne, an Army vet who claimed he organized militia snipers to target federal agents during the Bundy standoff in Nevada last year.
Political protest, which is free speech, is one thing, as was the original protest throughout Burns.   But when you and your boys get your guns, form a splinter group and take over a federal building, that is terrorism.  And yet, law enforcement is taking a low-key approach to the whole thing.  No national guard has been called in.  Nothing to see here.  Is this not the country that seeks to end terrorism?
And while the media are all too eager to cover a terrorism story, in this case, not so much.  Some media outlets painted the ongoing armed standoff as an innocuous event, more like a campfire gathering of guys roasting marshmallows in the woods: 
When the Black Panthers walked into a government building armed, the state of California changed the gun laws OVERNIGHT #OregonUnderAttack
What is terrorism?  The FBI defines terrorism as “the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.”  J. Edgar Hoover terrorized the black community for years, so the FBI should be a dependable source.
And yet, the working definition of terrorism does not apply in actual practice.  Remember, in the U.S., whether it actually counts as terrorism depends on the skin tone and religion of those doing the terrorizing.  So, black and brown people are painted as thugs, gangbangers and terrorists, in a nation that has empathy even for white mass murderers, who are captured alive.  Charleston shooter Dylann Roof—certainly a terrorist yet not called one—was even treated to Burger King on his way to jail, hours after the white supremacist had murdered nine black people at the Emanuel AME Church.  This, in a nation that has declared walking while black an offense punishable by death, as unarmed black women, men and children are shot for no good reason, left to die in a pool of their blood.
In the case of Oregon, the double standard of color coded terrorism speaks for itself.  At least one CNN expert was honest and embraced the double standard.  Law enforcement analyst Art Rodericksaid this white militia was not being treated like Black Lives Matter protesters or Muslims because they were not looting.
“This is a very rural area,” Roderick argued. “It is out in the middle of nowhere. What are they actually doing? They’re not destroying property, they’re not looting anything.”
“The last thing we need is some type of large confrontation because that’s when stuff goes bad,” he added. “And I think in this particular instance, if we just wait them out, see what they’ve got to say, then eventually, they’re all going to go home.”
Go home?  If Black Lives Matter protesters were to take over a federal building, armed to the teeth with firepower–and they certainly would not do this—they would wind up dead, or in prison for life on terrorism charges.
And it is almost fitting that Oregon provides the backdrop for this latest case of white domestic terrorism.  Known for its violent history of oppression against Native peoples, Oregon was established as a white racist utopia.  It was the only state whose founding constitution forbade black people from living within its boundaries, which was the case until 1926.  And today, Oregon is only 2 percent black.
Meanwhile, America is no stranger to white domestic terrorists.  For African Americans, the Ku Klux Klan was our ISIS.  They were praised in the White House, and controlled state governments throughout the country, including Oregon.  We faced the lynching and firebombing, and the aerial bombing of Black Wall Street.  Even today, black people fear for their lives, as America normalizes the violence against them.  This, as angry white men–uneducated, disaffected and wanting to “make America great again”—threaten to use their guns, their only manhood, against their perceived enemies.
But white terrorists are not taken seriously, because (white) boys will be boys.
Follow David A. Love on Twitter at @davidalove

Votes: 0
E-mail me when people leave their comments –

You need to be a member of TheBlackList Pub to add comments!

Join TheBlackList Pub


  • NYMetro

    May 13, 1985, West Philadelphia Pennsylvania, Osage Ave. The state of Pennsylvania, city of Philadelphia and the United States government vs. "Move". That is your answer in a nutshell.

  • Georgia

    @Brother Lukata, I am pretty sure that we all know what would happen to an armed BlackLivesMatter protest, they have already shown us that. Not to mention the DOJ can get all the demands in the world, whose demands are they gonna listen to? Ours?? Fat chance on that one.

  • WHY IMAGINE WHAT WOULD HAPPEN TO AN ARMED BLACKLIVESMATTER GROUP.  Why not do it and see fo' shu.  either that or demand that the DOJ take action immediately.

This reply was deleted.