Broad Unity and Necessary Struggle
May 24, 2022
The ongoing fight for the right to abortion has become especially crucial now, with the very clear indication that the “conservative” (really fascist) majority on the Supreme Court is poised to tear away this right (by overturning Roe v. Wade, the legal ruling and precedent which established—and for 50 years, until now, has maintained—the right to abortion nationwide). At this crucial time, the fight to defend the fundamental right to abortion needs to become an even more massive, sustained, determined resistance aimed at preventing the Supreme Court from overturning Roe v. Wade.
Uniting All Who Can Be United, Struggling Over Differences in a Principled Way
It is of profound importance to unite all who can be united in this crucial fight for the right to abortion. An important part of uniting people on the most solid basis, and waging this fight in the most powerful way, is struggling over critical questions such as: why the right to abortion is under attack, and what is essentially involved in this move to outlaw abortion; what it will mean if the right to abortion is ripped away; and how best to wage the fight to defend and preserve the right to abortion. This struggle needs to be waged in a principled way—not descending into personal attacks, or engaging in slanders of people with whom you disagree, but honestly examining the substance of different approaches, where they will actually lead, and whether they will strengthen, or weaken, the crucial fight for the right to abortion (and for a more just society overall).
It is in this spirit, and with this orientation, that I am going to speak to what is wrong with certain outlooks and programs which actually lead away from and will undermine the crucial and urgent fight to prevent the right to abortion from being ripped away by the fascists on the Supreme Court (and in society as a whole).
In a previous article, I examined in some depth why relying on the Democrats and funneling everything into voting for them is a strategy for accepting defeat and capitulating to the fascist offensive to eliminate the right to abortion.1 Here I am going to get into how certain “woke” positions create a lot of confusion and point in wrong directions, and actually undermine the fight for the right to abortion (and the fight against oppression overall).
In relation to abortion, many “woke folk” talk about “bodily autonomy”—when the essence of what is involved is not some abstract question of “bodily autonomy” but an attack on the fundamental right to abortion, a move to enslave women through forced motherhood: denying women the right to control their own reproduction. (As I have noted before, “bodily autonomy” is “a concept which, by the way, would logically include people coming from a very bad place, such as those anti-scientific lunatics and selfish individualists who refuse to get vaccinated against COVID.” And these anti-scientific lunatics overwhelmingly oppose the right to abortion.)2
In this connection, it is important to emphasize again the point I stressed in the article “The Fight for Abortion Rights and the Emancipation of Women”:
The essential question at stake with the escalating attack on the right to abortion is the fundamental status of the half of humanity that is female—whether they will be enslaved or emancipated.3
Anything which waters down or distracts from this essential truth is objectively aiding this fundamental attack on the half of humanity that is female—is undermining the fight for their emancipation, and the emancipation of humanity as a whole from any form of oppression and exploitation.4
But “watering down” and undermining is exactly what is done by many “woke” approaches.
Some people, influenced by “woke” thinking, argue that it is wrong to say that abortion is about controlling and degrading women, because this use of “women” as a general category does not bring out that taking away the right to abortion will especially hurt women of color. This, too, misses—and undermines—the understanding of what is essentially going on with the attack on the right to abortion. To repeat what I have emphasized in another previous article:
And the denial of this right especially affects low-income women, particularly impoverished Black and Brown women, who often are the ones in most desperate need of an abortion. At the same time, it is important to keep in mind that even for women—and girls—who may be in relatively well off, or even quite well off, situations economically, and could theoretically afford to travel to an area, or a country, where abortion is legal, there can still be serious obstacles to getting an abortion: abusive husbands and boyfriends, tyrannical patriarchal fathers, dogmatic religious authority, and a number of other factors. Once again, access to safe, legal abortion, as a fundamental right and a matter of personal choice, is of profound importance for women overall.5
It is possible, and it is important, to make clear that the fight around abortion is essentially about upholding—or denying—the rights and the humanity of women, as women, while at the same time bringing out that taking away the right to abortion will do great harm especially to impoverished women of color.
The most outrageous form of this “wokeness” is to erase women altogether—to talk about abortion without even mentioning women (instead using terms like “people who get pregnant”), when it is overwhelmingly women (and girls) who get pregnant and who need the right to safe and legal abortion—and the fascist drive to outlaw abortion has always been about controlling and degrading women.
It is not more “inclusive” to use terms like “people who get pregnant”—it is more diffusive: it dilutes and weakens the point that, in its essence, denying the right to abortion is about the patriarchal enslavement of women: Forced motherhood is enslavement of the half of humanity that is female. This is the main and essential thing going on with the attack on the right to abortion.
To again quote from “The Fight for Abortion Rights and the Emancipation of Women”:
Of course, in the case of the extremely small number of females who have transitioned (or are transitioning) to males but who retain female reproductive organs and might get pregnant, they should have the right to abortion, and to decent health care overall, without any stigma or discrimination—and in general attacks directed against trans people must be actively, vigorously opposed. But, in terms of its essential purpose and objective, the attack on the right to abortion is not aimed at trans people.... The attack on the right to abortion is a move to further intensify the already horrific oppression of women, denying them control of their lives and their very bodies, reducing them to breeders of children, cruelly subordinated to men and a patriarchal male-supremacist society. Forced motherhood is in fact female enslavement.6
Correctly focusing on the fact that the attack on the right to abortion is essentially aimed at enslaving women definitely can be and should be done while also strongly opposing discrimination, degradation, brutality and murder directed against trans people.