Legal and policy experts with the Project 21 black leadership network are available for comment on today's U.S. Supreme Court decision that allows perceived group racial disparities to be used as a trigger for enforcement of the Fair Housing Act.

"When those statistical differences alone are used as proof of discrimination, freedom and liberty are lost; but worse the constitutional protections provided to every American as an individual are lost too," said Project 21 co-chairman Horace Cooper, a legal commentator who taught constitutional law at George Mason University and is a former leadership staff member for the U.S. House of Representatives.

"It's a shame that the majority of justices are willing to allow allegations of discrimination in housing to be painted using a broad brush -- sometimes by those who may not even be among the aggrieved -- rather than finding and cutting out true instances of abuse with scalpel-like precision," said Archbishop Council Nedd II, Ph.D., author of multiple books and rector of St. Alban's Anglican Church in Pine Grove Mills, PA. "The Fair Housing Act was meant to be a scalpel, but the Court has now decided otherwise to our peril. Society is served better by a system that removes specific problems rather than pitting groups against each other."

On appeal from the federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the case of Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, et al. v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc, addressed a festering legal problem regarding the Fair Housing Act's use to address accusations of disparate racial impact instead of enforcing the law on a case-by-case, as-needed basis as was argued by its supporters when it was debated in Congress.

Specific to this case, the Inclusive Communities Project (ICP) claimed the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, a state agency, violated the federal Fair Housing Act by allocating housing tax credits to developers in a manner that they alleged broadly kept minorities in low-income minority-majority neighborhoods rather than allowing access to housing opportunities in wealthier majority-white communities in the Dallas metropolitan area. ICP charged the department's tax credit distribution policy creates a disparate impact on black recipients of such credits as a class rather than addressing individual instances of alleged abuse.

Project 21 joined a legal brief submitted to the Court that asked the justices to specifically define the legal scope of the Fair Housing Act. In the brief, it was argued that the Act was written "to apply solely to disparate treatment, not acts having disparate impact on protected classes" and that the U.S. Supreme Court must "consider the threshold question of whether disparate impact claims are even cognizable under the Fair Housing Act" since "disparate impact claims do not depend on the intent of the action or policy."

This legal brief joined by Project 21 was written and submitted to the Court by the Pacific Legal Foundation and was also joined by the Center for Equal Opportunity, Competitive Enterprise Institute, Cato Institute, Individual Rights Foundation and Reason Foundation.

In 2014 and 2015, Project 21 members have already been interviewed or cited by the media over 2,600 times -- including TVOne, the Philadelphia Inquirer, Fox News Channel, Westwood One, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, SiriusXM satellite radio and 50,000-watt talk radio stations such as KOA-Denver, WHO-Des Moines, WJR-Detroit, WBZ-Boston and KDKA-Pittsburgh -- on issues that include civil rights, entitlement programs, the economy, race preferences, education and corporate social responsibility. Project 21 has participated in cases before the U.S. Supreme Court regarding race preferences and voting rights and defended voter ID laws at the United Nations. Its volunteer members come from all walks of life and are not salaried political professionals.

Project 21, a leading voice of black conservatives for over two decades, is sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research (http://www.nationalcenter.org
).

 

You need to be a member of TheBlackList Pub to add comments!

Join TheBlackList Pub

Votes: 0
Email me when people reply –

Replies

  • From: National Action Network Membership@nationalactionnetwork.net

    REVEREND AL SHARPTON COMMENDS SCOTUS FAIR HOUSING AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT DECISIONS 

    NEW YORK – President and founder of National Action Network, Rev. Al Sharpton released this statement commending the United States Supreme Court for its decisions to uphold a key provision in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and preserved a crucial enforcement tool of the Fair Housing Act (FHA): 

    “Today, the Supreme Court strongly upheld a vital provision within the Affordable Care Act, protecting the tax credits that more than six million consumers are using right now to purchase quality health coverage. This decision means that the Affordable Care Act is here to stay, a welcome relief to the millions of low and moderate-income Americans who are now covered thanks to this law. I would hope Republicans would finally end their futile quest to repeal a law that is working and saving lives. 

    “The Supreme Court also acknowledged the role of the Fair Housing Act as an essential tool for ensuring all people have access to equal housing. Unfortunately, our country is still plagued with racism and discrimination and we need laws in place that protect justice and equality for all. The Fair Housing Act is an essential piece of legislation, necessary to protect disenfranchised communities from housing and lending discrimination. 

    “These are historic victories for our country and the millions of Americans who benefit from these important laws.” 

    Paid for by National Action Network
    106 W. 145th street 
    New York, NY 10039 

This reply was deleted.
https://theblacklist.net/